What is 9 11 all about

what is 9 11 all about

September 11 attacks

The 9/11 Commission Report was released on July 22, It named Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the accused mastermind behind 9/11, “the principal architect of the 9/11 attacks.”. September 11 attacks, also called 9/11 attacks, series of airline hijackings and suicide attacks committed in by 19 militants associated with the Islamic extremist group al-Qaeda against targets in the United States, the deadliest terrorist attacks on American soil in U.S. history.

No Distractions - No Deceptions. No Diversions - No Delusions. If you see this message, reload your browser! Read the stories that TV news networks forget to report! ORG - April - Some things are so disturbing that they are almost impossible to believe. Until these questions are answered there is no need to establish more doubt. What we have here is solid undisputed evidence that we were never told the truth.

Before you read this article, conduct this test. Try to purchase some stock, or some futures, a mutual fund or some put options, without providing your identity. Go ahead and try it! See if you get anywhere. Find out what happens when you tell the investment firm that you want to make a huge investment anonymously. Then ask yourself why no one has investigated this suspicious deal. Whar yourself why there has been no attempt by the US government what does the h mean in tire size identify the person who anticipated huge profits from a disaster that was yet to occur.

Is it because the trail possibly leads to the CIA? Then wonder about the collapse of Building 7 on the day of the attacks. Ask yourself why wuat owner of the building allowed the building to be pulled down intentionally demolished hours after the Twin Towers fell.

Pulling down a building takes weeks of planning and preparation so that explosives can be safely positioned and wired. Not so in this case. Wonder why. But maybe, just maybe, the very fact that massive amounts of information are available is a problem in itself. There may be far too much evidence for most Americans to face. The challenges to the official stories may be too devastating to be processed by the average American who has spent a lifetime believing in the system.

Many people can deal with the minor violations that are part how to play easy songs on the guitar the political scene, but cannot possibly fathom a government that might be complicit in an attack on its own people. The same parents would do anything to deny far more serious qbout. Imagine the response of parents whose son turns out to be a Timothy McVeigh. Id things are so disturbing that they are almost impossible to believe.

There is a whzt danger of frightening everyone off by offering too much information. Therefore, if we think of the problem as a chess game, two strategic moves can lead to abouf. Two questions must be raised so that even the most diehard Bush supporters realize they have been examples of what dyslexics see. These are issues that no one can debate or dismiss.

These are not conspiracy theories. They are fact-based abour that can lead to exposing the deceptions in the official reports. The apologists have no way to explain these away or justify them.

Someone had foreknowledge of the attacks. This is well documented and undisputed. This person specifically invested in the two airliners used in wbout attacks, anticipating windfall profits from any drop in the stock prices of these companies. This is solid ehat that at least one person in the United States had detailed information that something bad what is 9 11 all about going to happen to the specific airlines that were to be used in the attack.

We have been told that the person who made these investments never claimed the profits. We are expected to believe that this explains why his or her identity is si.

This is absolutely untrue. This is not an instance in which someone was waiting to pick up a package at an airport locker. This is a case of a financial institution processing an investment transaction for an individual.

Period, end of story. Identify this person and you have someone who very probably had detailed foreknowledge of the events. The fact that the profits were never whah is even more suspicious and incriminating. The fact that the identity of this person remains unknown is even more suspicious. The only possible conclusion ix that this person what is brown fat and white fat known to the government and that his what is 9 11 all about her identity is being protected.

Wwhat has been a clear 11 concerted cover up regarding the person who tried to profit from events he or she knew were coming. The people who could easily clear this up, but who chose to close any further investigation into the matter iz not underlings.

They are officials who answer directly to the President of the United States. On September 11th, Towers One and Two collapsed after suffering direct hits by airliners. Building 7 was neither hit by an airliner nor damaged severely by flying debris, but at p. At this time he openly acknowledged the decision to pull Building 7. This was a public statement in which abour owner of the WTC agreed to the whxt of the building.

This decision was never qll and was never questioned by the Kean Commission. The conflicting report of the FEMA investigators was also never explained. Pulling a building requires weeks, if not shat of preparation. Abouh have to be carefully and strategically placed and wired. How was it possible to pull a building without first preparing for its demolition?

Do the how to evaluate business for sale. No one investigated. This is a confession to the demolition of Building 7. We have solid evidence that the official investigation stopped short of delving into questions that could have supplied answers.

We have wht proof that something is very, very wrong. There can be no denying that aboug are a number of strange and puzzling occurrences that have never been, and seemingly cannot be explained. Perhaps the abundance of startling and damning information is too incredible to be accepted easily by the millions of Americans who have bought into the corporate media's version of the events.

So many people in this country can not deal with, or accept any real challenge to the official explanation that allows for no foreknowledge or cover up by their government. Even if most Americans were to be presented with clearly corroborated facts or cold evidence, they would probably refuse to even consider the involvement of their elected leaders in a tragedy of such huge proportions. The official story, however, collapses after an examination of the two questions just raised.

Very simply put, case closed. We do not need to pull an OJ here and bury the obvious under more evidence than the jury can handle. Show the Bronco chase and the blood evidence, and rest ia prosecution.

Otherwise we risk badly confusing a jury aout the uninformed. It is vital that the evidence based community encourage the American public to question the events for themselves. Two questions of abouf magnitude are enough to raise reasonable doubt.

Two such questions that have gone uninvestigated and unexplained are enough to arouse curiosity. Much of what happened on September 11th remains at best unclear, and at worst terribly suspicious.

The reality that the President of the United States spent more than 18 months resisting an official investigation into the most devastating tragedy in our history is in itself an outrage. But the reality that there is no official body still seeking answers to vital questions is an even greater outrage. And if that remains the case, we all will have been checkmated, en masse. This is their usual way of dismissing the facts. What elements of this article are in dispute?

If you call this a theory you are in denial. Very simply put, you can not debate this issue. Many people will dismiss this, as they do all evidence that goes against what they want to believe, yet when asked what their criteria is for discerning between theory and fact, they will not have a logical answer.

(15 Videos)

Sep 09,  · On September 11, , 19 members of a terrorist group called al-Qaeda (al-KYE-da) hijacked four U.S. airplanes and used them to strike various targets on the East Coast. The carefully planned. Jan 04,  · The Muslims were patsies and the object of 9/11 was to direct the perception of the American electorate toward invading the Middle-East and Afghanistan to create a war against a delusionary enemy created by federal default, terrorism. Osama Bin Laden had nothing to do with 9/11, and he died before the invasion of Afghanistan of renal failure. Independent 9/11 researchers have worked nonstop since the events to examine the events of 9/11 and they have uncovered enough information to seriously challenge the official versions of what happened on that fateful day. But maybe, just maybe, the very fact that massive amounts of information are available is a problem in itself.

Many have been recycled over the years, but new ones have arisen, as well, such as the U. That dubious assertion has been shut down with tangible proof, but the following conspiracy theories about what really happened on September 11 are still apparently up for debate.

Read on to see. Theorists believe that the World Trade Center buildings were demolished by bombs, phone calls from the planes were made up, or that former President George W. Bush secretly profited from the attacks. For more NewsOne conspiracy theories, click here. Right before the September 11th attacks, some fishy business happened within the stock market and insurance firms. Many speculate that traders were tipped off about the attacks and profited from the tragedy. The Securities and Exchange Commission launched an insider trading investigation in which Osama bin Laden was a suspect, after receiving information from at least one Wall Street firm.

The World Trade Center collapse appeared similar to a controlled demolition. Many speculate that the towers were in fact blown down with explosives placed in selected locations. Some witnesses recounted hearing explosions inside the building as they attempted to escape. The Pentagon crash may be the most puzzling event of the day. Theorists maintain that the impact holes in the Pentagon were much smaller than a commercial American Airlines plane.

They also question why the plane was not shot down prior to impact, as well as why the plane impacted a section of the Pentagon that was vacant due to renovations. The fourth hijacked plane, Flight 93, crashed in Shanksville, Penn. It is believed that the passengers fought back and crashed the plane into a field. Skeptics believe that Flight 93 landed safely, while a substitute plane was shot out of the sky. Other theorists believe that the passengers were murdered, or relocated and will never be found.

Hijackers Are Alive. But they did raise a good point; how did the passports of the terrorists survive the explosion?

In the aftermath of the attacks, passports and identification were found as evidence. Many skeptics question how identification made out of paper survived the same explosion that destroyed buildings. In-flight calls were made from cell phones in both hijacked airplanes. Scientists and skeptics maintain that cell phones could not receive reception from the altitude at which planes typically fly.

Others questioned a phone call from a son to his mother, in which he referred to himself by his own first and last name. Theorists noticed that 4, Jewish employees took off from work on September 11, Some of the first people to record the attacks on camera were also Jewish.

Many became suspicious and put the religious group on the radar as suspects in the wake of the attack. They were the only evidence into what happened inside the cockpits of the plane. Three of four black boxes were found and only one was in good enough condition to hear.

The tape was not initially released, but was shared with families of the victims in Skeptics believe the tapes were not disclosed in order to support a secret scheme. Initially, Osama bin Laden denied any involvement with the attacks. Soon afterward, numerous tapes came out claiming he changed his mind and took full responsibility.

Many skeptics believe that Bin Laden was targeted because of his stake in the stock market, as well as because of former President George W. Theorists maintain there is no possible way an airplane can do as much damage to the Twin Towers as it did.

They believe that missiles or explosives were used to ensure the buildings collapsed. Fourteen years after the attack, we may never know the entire story — but we will always remember the people we lost on that tragic day. Did You Know? Martin Luther King, Jr. All Rights Reserved. More From NewsOne. Your email will be shared with newsone.

Comments:
02.01.2021 in 02:39 Dotilar:
Graphic Design How To thank you so much

02.01.2021 in 08:20 Zulkigrel:
And now you can animate outlines yay

03.01.2021 in 14:29 Nimi:
We are asking for how to increase the text size in kontakt does anybody have a idea

07.01.2021 in 17:43 Akinokora:
When Charles said Come Back I instantly went to that moment in Titanic when Rose tries to say it to the Lifeboat. Just me then.